Latest News
Following features about the River Ivel 14 pence expedition by canoe from Ivel Springs to Offord on BBC Look East (1st September 18:30 News) and on BBC Three Counties Radio (2nd September 08:50) a statement from Affinity Water was read out each time saying they will be reducing abstraction by 228 Million litres a year - like this was going to be a major contribution to preventing the upper part of this rare chalk river from drying out like it did in 2018-19 and has again now in 2022.
The person reading the statement on the radio even added: 'gosh, that sounds a lot!'
Unfortunately we never got a chance to reply, because that 228 million litres a year is actually not a lot at all.
Affinity water are currently abstracting about 13 million litres every day from their boreholes at Baldock and Letchworth.
That is 4,745,000,000, or 4.745 billon, litres per year.
So Affinity's much publicized 228 million litres equals a mere 4.8% of that 4.745 billon litres.
It's up to you to decide if this tiny reduction in abstraction is likely to make a difference to our river. RevIvel certainly didn't think it would, so earlier this year it commissioned it's own scientist to investigate. The resulting Lawson Report notes that to maintain a healthy chalk river, abstraction should be less than 10% of average recharge as per the CaBA chalk stream strategy.
Recharge is the amount of rainfall which lands on the river catchment every year, soaks in to the ground, descends through the chalk to the aquifer, to eventually emerge from the springs into the river. This is how all chalk rivers work, the clear, mineral-rich, constant-temperature water which emerges from chalk springs supports a unique and beautiful biodiversity in the river below, but the upper Ivel is dead because no water, not a drop, is emerging from the springs, and the river is bone dry.

The river is not dry because its been a particularly hot and dry summer in 2022; historically, the river never dried out. It's dry because Affinity Water's abstractions have gradually risen to around 50% of average recharge, putting it amongst the most heavily abstracted chalk rivers in the whole World.
The Lawson Report calculates that to meet the 10% recharge limit, abstraction must be reduced by 81%. This makes the 4.8% reduction promised by Affinity look very modest indeed.
Obviously Affinity Water can't just stop supplying the missing 4.517 billion litres per year to their customers in the Baldock and Letchworth area, but there is a simple solution, which is to back off pumping the boreholes, let the springs flow, let the river run, let the biodiversity recover, and abstract that same water further down stream.
Government may get a lot of flak for underinvestment in the water supply industry, but actually this was all thought of fifty or sixty years ago and the infrastructure to achieve it was installed in the 1970's. Water runs down the river Ivel into the Great Ouse, and 10 miles further on it is abstracted at Offord into Grafham Water reservoir, it is then easily returned to the Baldock and Letchworth area via the existing water distribution network.
Affinity Water has a big campaign going at the moment called Save Our Streams. It's perfectly within Affinity's power to save our stream; the infrastructure is in place, and the cost to reduce abstraction to 10% of recharge and rescue miles of river for people and wildlife to enjoy is just 14 pence per person per week.
£0.14 per week. That’s right, just fourteen pence per week added to water bills for every person Affinity water supplies with water in the Baldock and Letchworth area would permanently save the river Ivel.
For the second time in three years our rare and beautiful chalk river Ivel is again bone dry at Ivel Springs nature reserve and all the way to Radwell. It is not dry because of the recent hot weather or the drought; Ivel springs is supplied with mineral rich ground water from the vast reserves under the Weston Hills and probably has not dried up through natural causes since the last Ice age.
It's dry because the Environment Agency lets Affinity Water pump about 13 million litres of water every day from their boreholes at Baldock into the public water supply before that water has a chance to get into the river. Affinity Water receives in excess of £5 million per annum in sales of this water.

For a long time both organizations denied that this pumping of 13,000 tons of water per day had much, if any, effect on the river, so earlier this year, revIvel commissioned an independent study. The Lawson report was published in July. It not only exposed some discrepancies in their data and hence the conclusions they had come to, but unexpectedly proposed an almost ready to go solution.
The plan is simple: Reduce abstraction at Baldock immediately to a much more sustainable 2.4 million litres per day. This will allow the ground water to rise back to its natural level and spill out of the springs which supply the river all year round just as they always did. It might take a while to get going, perhaps 18 months, because they’ve been taking so much water for so long that the natural ground water level has been depressed by as much as 8 metres, but it will happen. The water flows 17 miles down the Ivel to Tempsford where it joins the Great Ouse, and then a further 9 miles to Offord where it is sucked out by the existing infrastructure into Grafham Water reservoir. From Grafham, clean water is returned up the existing plumbing into the Baldock and Letchworth local water network so there is no net change in public water supply availability.
All this new water in the Ivel will let it thrive for the first time in perhaps 100 years; the benefits to people, wildlife and the environment will be massive; maybe we will even see the trout which have been absent for so long.
Of course there might be a cost to all this, and Affinity provides us with the figures on page 107 of Appendix 4 to their Business Plan for 2020 - 2025. They say it costs £60 to pump one million litres from their own boreholes or £217 to buy the same thing from Anglian Water at Grafham.
This means the Lawson Plan could cost Affinity an extra £607,433 per annum to supply that same 13 million litres per day to its customers in the Baldock and Letchworth area. On page 4 of their Plan for Customers and Communities Affinity Water says its customers use an average of 152 litres of water per person per day. This means that 13 million litres supplies 85,526 people. If you divide the extra cost of saving the Ivel by that number of people, it works out at 14 pence each per week.
Saving this rare chalk river is entirely possible; what else can you buy for just 14 pence a week?
Since the publication of John Lawson’s report on the River Ivel there has been a flurry of meetings with key stakeholders. The report was launched at a joint meeting with the Environment Agency and Affinity Water in June.
We held a meeting with the Environment Agency recently to outline our concerns about how and where they monitor the health of the river for the purposes of the Water Framework Directive (WFD). Basically, we are concerned that the assessment point is 10kms downstream after the confluence with the Pix Brook. By this point the Ivel no longer has the characteristics of a chalk stream. Additionally, the assessment point “benefits” from the 10 Ml/day output from Letchworth sewage treatment works.!
Charles Rangeley -Wilson OBE (author, conservationist, and Chair of a national chalk streams restoration group) has explained this situation perfectly in his blog which is well worth a read:
https://chalkstreams.org/2022/07/10/revivel-2/
We have further meetings scheduled in August with key personnel from Water Resources East (WRE) to try and persuade them to take up John Lawson’s suggestions. These include reducing abstraction from the chalk aquifer and letting this water flow all the way down the Ivel into the Ouse (giving us a much healthier river all year) and potentially using the extra flow in the Ouse to top up Grafham Water reservoir. Water can be returned to Baldock in existing pipes from Grafham Water.The headwaters of chalk streams often suffer from over-abstraction, and we are proposing that the Ivel is used as a national test case to demonstrate the validity of the “Chalk Streams First” model.
https://chalkstreams.org/2020/05/24/its-high-time-we-put-chalk-streams-first/
These upcoming meetings are key in getting the needs of the Ivel into the long-term regional plan for water use in the East of England.
As you will be aware, the rainfall last autumn and winter was very low. This rainfall is critical to the recharge of groundwater-fed chalk streams. This left the upper River Ivel in a precarious position coming into 2022. Spring and summer rainfall has also been very low, and we are officially in a “prolonged dry period” according to The Environment Agency. The head spring of the river only flowed for about 8 weeks, in March and April. Indeed, ‘’flow’’ is a very generous description – ‘’seeped’’ is more accurate.
It should, and historically did, flow strongly all year round. Revivel commissioned a report from John Lawson whose analysis confirms that under natural flow regime, flow would have been perennial. The flow ceased at the head spring at the end of April and the river has been progressively drying up since then. Flow through the culvert at Ivel Springs Nature Reserve stopped at the end of June, and mid-August there was no flow at the Iron Bridge in Radwell Meadows. The southernmost springs in Radwell Meadows have also stopped flowing and we can expect this trend to continue given the forecast of hot and dry weather.
Unbelievably, Affinity Water are showing no signs of implementing a hosepipe ban and clearly put the freedom of people to use hoses, sprinklers, and pressure washers above the health of a globally rare chalk stream. If you are as outraged by this as we are, we suggest you let them, and your local MP know your feelings on a regular basis until the situation improves.
Affinity Water- Affinity Water, Tamblin Way, Hatfield, AL10 9EZ
Oliver Heald – Oliver.heald.mp@parliament.uk
Earlier this year, thanks to the huge generosity of Revivel’s members and many others who very kindly donated , we were able to commission the services of John Lawson (a renowned specialist in this field) to conduct a study on the upper Ivel and make recommendations as to how to save our river.
His draft report was discussed in detail at a recent meeting with the Environment Agency (EA) and
Affinity Water. John Lawson and Charles Rangeley-Wilson OBE (author, conservationist, and Chair of
a national chalk streams restoration group) supported RevIvel at the meeting.
If would like to read the redacted report in full please click the link below.
For the highlight of the report the summary is as follows.
Key findings of the draft report:
- With “abstraction as a percentage of recharge” (note 1) at 53%, the upper Ivel is amongst the most over-abstracted chalk streams in the country and, as a result, the river is increasingly dry for long periods
- Historic evidence supports that the water table used to be 3-6m higher. At Black Horse Mill the water used to flow all year round, providing sufficient power to grind corn (note 2). John Lawson concludes that reduction in flows is consistent with increasing abstraction
- Impact of abstraction:
- John Lawson employs the “Chalk Streams First” mathematical model to explain the daily water balance model (note 3). EA representatives have agreed many of the principles behind the model
- Whereas Affinity Water bases its views about the impacts of abstraction, in the area around the boreholes, on 3 “switch off” tests conducted in 2015/16; whereby 1 borehole at a time was switched off for between 10-30 days. Affinity Water’s conclusion was that stopping abstraction resulted in no discernible increase in flow (you might agree with John Lawson when he countered that these switch-off tests might have been too short/ limited in scope to give measurable flow increases?)
Recommendations of the draft report:
- The existing licence of 14.8 Ml/d would need to be reduced to 2.4 Ml/d to achieve the CaBA (note 4) recommendation that abstraction should comprise no more than 10% of the recharge rate, to ensure a healthy chalk stream
- John Lawson suggests an innovative, neat solution to save the upper Ivel.
Please see high level illustration of the proposed solution to save our river:
Benefits of John Lawson’s proposed solution:
1. It does not cost much in terms of new infrastructure i.e. low carbon
2. It does not cost much in terms of water requirements (net 4.5Ml/d)
3. It utilises the emergency storage capacity of the aquifer and could help alleviate drought
conditions locally
4. The upper Ivel could be a test case to save chalk streams nationally
Next steps:
1. John Lawson’s paper is being peer reviewed (note 5)
2. RevIvel will submit/ present the proposed solution to Water Resources East/ Water
Resources South East (WRE/ WRSE) to be included in regional and national plans which
determine water allocation for the rest of the century. It is critical for our voice to be heard
3. Further meetings are planned over the summer with Anglian Water, Affinity Water and the
EA to:
Achieve consensus on the impacts of abstraction
Challenge the EA classification (per The Water Framework Directive) of the flows
and ecological status of the upper Ivel; this is currently “good”, making it hard to
argue that urgent action is needed
Keep pressure on the relevant bodies to adequately take account of the needs of the
upper Ivel
Finally:
If you have any questions or can offer expert help in any of these areas, please contact
media@revivel.org. We would love to hear from you.
This update covers the “John Lawson” work only. A further update will follow about the state of the
river and other actions which RevIvel is undertaking.
Notes:
1. Average abstraction 12.4Ml/d/ average recharge is 23.6Ml/d. Recharge refers to the rate of
replenishment of the aquifer which is largely dependent on autumn and winter rainfall
2. There used to be perennial flows of 5-10Ml/d (millions of litres per day)
3. The CSF model computes the daily aquifer storage within the Upper Ivel catchment by simulating the
water balance of inflows from effective rain and outflows from river flow, underflow and abstraction
4. Note 4: The Catchment Based Approach (CaBA) is an inclusive, civil society-led initiative that works in
partnership with Government, Local Authorities, Water Companies, businesses and more, to maximise
the natural value of our environment
5. Note 5: Peer review: the process by which something proposed (as for research or publication) is
evaluated by a group of experts in the appropriate field. Peer review enhances the credibility of the
manuscript
RevIvel fedback to Fiver Rivers on 6th July. The upper Ivel has often been over-looked so we appreciate the focus t on our river. However the River Restoration plan fails to address the fundamental problem faced by the upper Ivel i.e. that it is dry and dying due to over-abstraction.
Specifically:
- The groundwater support (augmentation) planned is minimal e.g. 0.55Ml/d in the context of what is needed.
- The existing abstraction licence of 14.8 Ml/d would need to be reduced to 2.4 Ml/d to achieve a healthy chalk stream.
- Please see our full feedback via the link below.